On 2/15/16 9:14 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > Dear OpsAWG: > > This is the second of three messages [0] to determine what the OpsAWG > should do with TACACS+ > > Should the ID, as presented, or as revised by the WG, be published as > one or more RFCs?
Yes, for reasons previously stated. Eliot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
