On 2/15/2016 3:14 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
Dear OpsAWG:
This is the second of three messages [0] to determine what the OpsAWG
should do with TACACS+
Should the ID, as presented, or as revised by the WG, be published as
one or more RFCs?
Yes
Scott, Tianran and Warren
[0]: The first one was the IPR one ( "Untangling - Explicit call for
IPR on draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-00")
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
