Yes! -- Tassos
Warren Kumari wrote on 15/2/16 22:14: > Dear OpsAWG: > > This is the second of three messages [0] to determine what the OpsAWG should > do with TACACS+ > > Should the ID, as presented, or as revised by the WG, be published as one or > more RFCs? > > Scott, Tianran and Warren > > [0]: The first one was the IPR one ( "Untangling - Explicit call for IPR on > draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-00") > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
