Eliot,

The certificate part seems basically right (I think you should require
specific KeyUsage bits).

Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see anything about the level of trust you
should have in cases where you can't reliably tie the endpoint's
transmissions to its certificate.

-Ekr


On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Joe Clarke <jcla...@cisco.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chair hat on:
>
> We would like to give this call for review a week timeout with the WG.
>
> Please pay special attention to the security changes Eliot has
> described below when reviewing the new text.
>
> We are looking to push this forward EOD on May 25.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Joe
>
> On 5/17/18 11:36, Eliot Lear wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This draft is intended to address all IESG comments.  Thanks to the
> > IESG and reviewers for their contributions.  A summary of the
> > changes is below, but people may wish to do a side by side review.
> >
> > Eliot
> >
> >
> > * Small edits to the abstract * Clarity in the introduction that
> > the focus is on protecting the device. * Many grammatical/wording
> > improvements * Clarity when MUD is most effective. * MUD controller
> > -> MUD manager * Normative language boiler plate change * Clarity
> > on what should happen when a MUD manager can't reach a MUD file
> > server * A few reference updates * Clarity on the validity time of
> > a MUD file * Added references to RFCs 5911 and 5912 for SMI
> > changes * one additional data element (documentation) * one change
> > based on an update to the ACL model during its last call *
> > Subsection numbering for node descriptions. * Improved text around
> > "controller", direction-initiated. * Simplified MUD-URL text. *
> > Optional reserved space added to DHCP, LLDP options * Simplified
> > DHCP processing. * A new certificate field to bind the manufacturer
> > certificate to the mud signer. * A content type definition for the
> > SMI. * Updated security considerations.
> >
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iF0EARECAB0WIQTMiWQHc8wChijkr7lvaI+K/hTPhwUCWv6vBgAKCRBvaI+K/hTP
> hwzAAJ4gQdPZ93IFCwO7nWOca4gu7xbwkwCeJPLWlBoGGKDtuQp8sUHVJy+2lmY=
> =CyhD
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to