Hi Erich:

On 10/1/07, Erich Focht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Initially I expected that in a first step we'd do it this way. Until stuff
> gets stable. Then I expected that maybe we upload only the opkg-* rpms to a
> central place. Oh well, I'm a friend of rather clean transition steps...
>
> We need urgently a plan to get trunk back running for all distros.

I agree -- I think doing this interim thing of checking the opkg-*
meta packages into SVN repository may be able to get us back up and
running quickly.  However, there is another blocking issue with the
opkg-* meta packages in that they do not have any dependencies at all
for the packages they are supposed to be wrapper (see my other post).

> In the early days this didn't make sense, but now it does, more and more.
> Still, I'd consider this a minor issue compared to the rest of the trouble.

This isn't a critical fix -- more like a "nice to have" thing, so yes,
we can deal with this later on (but please keep this in the back of
our minds :-) ).

I am glad we are on the same page!

Cheers,

Bernard

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to