Quoting Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Hi Erich:
>
> On 10/1/07, Erich Focht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Initially I expected that in a first step we'd do it this way. Until stuff
> > gets stable. Then I expected that maybe we upload only the opkg-* rpms to a
> > central place. Oh well, I'm a friend of rather clean transition steps...
> >
> > We need urgently a plan to get trunk back running for all distros.
>
> I agree -- I think doing this interim thing of checking the opkg-*
> meta packages into SVN repository may be able to get us back up and
> running quickly.  However, there is another blocking issue with the
> opkg-* meta packages in that they do not have any dependencies at all
> for the packages they are supposed to be wrapper (see my other post).

If i understand correctly what you mean, i do not agree with you. This
dependency should not be there. If you want to install standard binary package
for OPKGs, use opkg-<package>-client or opkg-<package>-server depending on what
part of the OPKG you want to install. For what i know we do not want to install
binary package for both the client and server side on the same system by
default.

>
> > In the early days this didn't make sense, but now it does, more and more.
> > Still, I'd consider this a minor issue compared to the rest of the trouble.
>
> This isn't a critical fix -- more like a "nice to have" thing, so yes,
> we can deal with this later on (but please keep this in the back of
> our minds :-) ).

If you see a critical point, please create a ticket!



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to