Quoting Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I think we need to all agree what we should be doing for the 5.1 release. > > We can stick with the old way, as you suggested, but we need to > incorporate the opkg-* meta packages because OSCAR trunk currently > will not install, unless those packages are available. For some > distributions they are uploaded to gforge. I suppose we could also > build and check them into the SVN repository in each packages' > distro-specific RPMs directory.
There is somewhere a document that summarizes our initial goals for OSCAR-5.1, based on old discussions and with each we all agreed. I also did some developments around OPKGC and i really think we can support online repositories generated by OPKGC (not for binary packages that are currently in SVN). I can of course describe what i did and what i plan to do for OSCAR-5.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
