IMHO,

...I don't want to hurt feelings in this list, although the style and
logo is good looking I don't think that's the look and feel of a
serious movement like osflash. People trying to enter the SWF world
could not take us seriously due to this kind of look.

But it's only my opinion. I agree with Adam Robertsont that the
original look (the white one) was for me the best option at the
moment.

...Hope I don't hurt anyone with my thoughts but I'm trying to look
things from outside of our world and I can't get what's the intention
of that funky logo (that is great by the other hand and maybe for
other issues).

Just an opinion.

Cheers,

C.



2005/11/30, John Grden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't agree about the links as buttons - on Red5, it was always a pain to
> have people find the "links".  AT least with the buttons, people can pick up
> on them right away.  I know it seems a bit "Romper room-ish" but, I like the
> fact that there's no mistake on where you can click.
>
> On 11/30/05, Mark Winterhalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Take a look:
> > > http://osflash.org
> >
> > cool. i like.
> > the old one was good, too, but i believe this one better reflects the
> > openness of a wiki. what i don't like, though, is that "links as
> > buttons" thing. i prefer links as... links. the old fashioned way.
> >
> > also, about the header graphics:
> > stealing an idea from flashgamecoders.com, how about some small flash
> > works in there?
> > max 10k or something like that, developed with OS tools only, and
> > limited to flash7 (until we linux users get the new plugin)? with
> > downloadable source, of course.
> >
> > mark
> >
> >
> > On 11/30/05, Aral Balkan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I had some free time today (the eye of the storm, no doubt) and
> > > lightened up the OSFlash design a bit. My emphasis is to make it
> > > easy-to-read and as clean as possible. (And hey, let's reflect the funky
> > > character of the community and the graffiti-like nature of the wiki
> > > while we're at it too why don't we?) :)
> > >
> > > Take a look:
> > > http://osflash.org
> > >
> > > An update on the mascot contest, btw: I am going to be working with the
> > > entrants on a different design -- one of which we will choose. It's very
> > > important that we get the mascot right as it will reflect the character
> > > of OSFlash so I am being overly anal about it. Please bear with us a
> > > little longer on that one.
> > >
> > > I hope you enjoy the new design!
> > >
> > > Aral
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > osflash mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://snafoo.org/
> > jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > osflash mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> John Grden - Blitz
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
>


--
::| Carlos Rovira
::| http://www.carlosrovira.com

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to