I do want to take any sides, but I agree with Mike. "Conspiracy theory" for me doesn't fit, I believe in dialog. As a user, i would prefer to have only one open-source flash community recognized and supported by Adobe, but completely managed by the community itself. I don't think this is that difficult to achieve, it's just a question of dialog and effort. And to know if it's something that everybody wants (both the osflash community and Adobe).
... just my opinion... João Saleiro Mike Chambers wrote: > Im going to call bullshit on that. > > We have been very supportive of OSFlash, mentioning it in articles, > numerous keynotes, and contributing projects to it. > > Look, this isnt some big conspiracy. Some people wanted to setup a > site that could host projects revolving around multiple Adobe > prodcuts and technologies (not just Flash). Did they screw up by not > pinging Aral and other OSFLash people first to give them a heads up? > Yes. But that doesn't mean we are out to kill OSFlash. > > Sorry for the rant, but this is completely ridiculous. I realize it > is fun to play the "us verses the big bad corporation card", but > sometimes it is really just a stretch. > > mike chambers > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Oct 19, 2006, at 5:06 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote: > > >> Question: Where is the point in putting efforts into a open source >> platform if the platform distributor does not pay value/attention >> to what they already do? >> > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
