Hi Robert,
I don't expect to win your over, but I sure want to correct things as see as off target so that others in the community don't get the wrong impression about stuff like OpenGL, etc.
I'm still not convinced that OpenGL itself can be considered a "standard", but that's mostly semantics. opengl.org has "industry standard" in the page title, but that term is mostly marketing and doesn't mean much. MS could say Windows is the "industry standard" OS because it's widely used. It doesn't make it an actual standard.
But anyways, if it's a standard then more power to them! They should put "The standard for high performance graphics" instead of "industry standard" IMHO, but that's still just semantics.
I hate it when I start arguing semantics and it appears that I'm going against something I'm actually quite fond of and use everyday. Sorry for going off the mark (once again).
J-S -- ______________________________________________________ Jean-Sebastien Guay [email protected] http://www.cm-labs.com/ http://whitestar02.webhop.org/ _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
