>Which one is better ? Adapter Widget + QT is more universal
2009/8/28 Sajjad <dosto.wa...@gmail.com> > Hello > > Which one is better ? > > Adapter Widget or OSG Widget ? > > > Sajjad > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Alex Sierra <algsie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What about using osg widgets instead? >> >> -- A. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> >> On Aug 28, 2009, at 6:01 AM, Maxim Gammer <maxgam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >>> >>> I've got a proposal to make changes in OSG for better compatibility with >>> QT. >>> >>> Method's name "emit" needs to be replaced in namespace osgParticle. >>> >>> The thing is that "emit" is a name of the macros in QT. Of course, we can >>> redefine "emit" like that: >>> >>> #ifdef emit >>> #define MACRO1_SAVE emit >>> #endif >>> #undef emit >>> .....#include <osg....> >>> #ifdef MACRO1_SAVE >>> #define emit MACRO1_SAVE >>> #undef MACRO1_SAVE >>> #endif >>> >>> , but this solution won't let us use signal/slot stuff. >>> >>> It seems that QT preprocessor replaces "emit" in program listing. >>> >>> The simpliest way to solve that - change method name from "emit" to >>> something else. This will let us using signal/slot things in QT. >>> >>> -- >>> Maxim Gammer >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> osg-users mailing list >>> osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org >>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> osg-users mailing list >> osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org >> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > > -- Maxim Gammer
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
