Hi Tom, this solution won't let us use signal/slot stuff (
2009/8/28 Jolley, Thomas P <thomas.p.jol...@boeing.com> > Hi Maxim, > > What was the result of adding -DQT_NO_EMIT to the compilation flags that > Antonin Linares suggested? > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org/msg27183.html > > ---- > Tom Jolley > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Maxim Gammer [mailto:maxgam...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, August 28, 2009 6:02 AM > *To:* OpenSceneGraph Users > *Subject:* [osg-users] Improvement of QT and OSG compatibility > > Hello, > > I've got a proposal to make changes in OSG for better compatibility with > QT. > > Method's name "emit" needs to be replaced in namespace osgParticle. > > The thing is that "emit" is a name of the macros in QT. Of course, we can > redefine "emit" like that: > > #ifdef emit > > #define MACRO1_SAVE emit > > #endif > > #undef emit > > .....#include <osg....> > > #ifdef MACRO1_SAVE > > #define emit MACRO1_SAVE > > #undef MACRO1_SAVE > > #endif > > , but this solution won't let us use signal/slot stuff. > > It seems that QT preprocessor replaces "emit" in program listing. > > The simpliest way to solve that - change method name from "emit" to > something else. This will let us using signal/slot things in QT. > > -- > Maxim Gammer > > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > > -- Maxim Gammer
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
