Hi Kim, when I load ocean scene, it shows up in a "View in a window" mode, and you had to specify the size for the god rays or such, dont remember the details now. Do you know what I mean ?
Nick http://www.linkedin.com/in/tnick On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Kim Bale <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Nick, > > I'm not sure what you mean by "it's own viewer" could you expand? > > Cheers. > > Kim. > > 2010/1/27 Trajce Nikolov <[email protected]> > > I would like to jump into this discussion with few other "request". As is >> implemented now, it has its own viewer. To make it work in my defined >> viewer, I had to switch off distorsion, glare and underwaterdof. Would be >> nice if these works as well with a given viewer >> >> Nick >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/tnick >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Kim Bale <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Paul, >>> >>> The reason why both front and back facing polys are rendered is because >>> the waves have an average height of zero so if you're at that height you >>> usually able to see both front facing and back facing wave polys. This was >>> done a while back before a lot of the effects were added. It's probably not >>> necessary any more since a lot of the under/over water effects use this >>> height to decide which of the effects set should be turned on (above or >>> below effects). So there isn't really a partially submerged state any more. >>> >>> However, what is slightly worrying is that you are seeing back facing >>> polys above water. This suggests broken polys on the surface. I rewrote the >>> code for tessellating the surface a while ago, but haven't managed to add it >>> to the library yet. It will get added I just can't say when at the moment. >>> Hopefully disabling back face culling is sufficient for you application. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Kim. >>> >>> >>> >>> 2010/1/15 Paul Palumbo <[email protected]> >>> >>> Okay... Now that I'm understanding more of the code lately, maybe that >>>> wasn't the best of images to reference. >>>> >>>> However, I'm seeing exactly the same black dots in the image when I use >>>> the standard oceanExample case with its sky dome and viewing above the >>>> ocean >>>> surface. When I turn on back face culling, I do not see the black dots. >>>> >>>> What does it mean to have back facing polygons when above the ocean >>>> surface? I can understand this when you are under the ocean surface but >>>> above. >>>> >>>> Paul P. >>>> >>>> ------------------ >>>> Read this topic online here: >>>> http://forum.openscenegraph.org/viewtopic.php?p=22689#22689 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> osg-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> osg-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> osg-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > >
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
