OFF TOPIC :) By the way, the tutorials section is needing some love from the community. The tutorials in the old trac were not compiling anymore ( they were in OSG-1.x though), if somebody wants to post some it would be nice.
Thanks 2014-08-29 19:18 GMT+02:00 Jordi Torres <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > > 2014-08-29 18:43 GMT+02:00 Jan Ciger <[email protected]>: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 08/29/2014 05:59 PM, Robert Osfield wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Is there particular short comings with the existing Joomla that a >> > wiki would solve better? >> >> I am with Robert on this one. It is fairly easy to add content to the >> existing website for anyone who wants to do so. Creating another >> website only because you want to use your preferred technology >> (nothing against wikis!) is not really helpful - it would only >> fragment the resources which are in short supply already. >> >> See the problems with the OSG forum - it has a serious shortage of >> moderators, so posts from new users don't get approved in time, spam >> gets through, etc. And someone still has to maintain it, so that it >> doesn't get hacked or broken. >> >> How is going a separate wiki help here? Are you willing to keep >> maintaining it long term? If yes, why not to maintain/improve the >> documentation on the OSG website? Is anything wrong with it? If yes, >> why it cannot be fixed? >> > To summarize - I am all out for better docs, but please lets not >> splinter the few resources we have already for the sake of reinventing >> the wheel. >> >> > That's exactly my point. I have dedicated hundreds of unpaid hours to get > the current website ( less than two years alive ) working, it has been a > tone of work migrating from the old trac: hundreds of articles, outdated > documentation, joomla template tweaking, etc. We -the community- discussed > the structure, the technology to use, less than two years ago. I did it > happy to be contributing to the OSG community. > > Maybe the result is not the best for all the people. And for sure it can > be improved. But first try to improve that we already have, before > reinventing the wheel. > > What I had to remark with my first mail was the fact that adding > documentation to the website is quite easy, or at least that's my point of > view. A wiki won't make a difference, you should ask for permissions and > then edit some page, or do some new page. I didn't want to sound rude so my > answer was something like: go and hit to the wall yourself, I'm not gonna > do it twice, if you come with something better it will be ok. > > > Thanks. > > > >> All the best, >> >> Jan >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1 >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ >> >> iD8DBQFUAK3En11XseNj94gRAmgdAKDCdPfcz5oOVDGmIDXHVY2sTIfWzACeMbTA >> OnW+JnYEZJ2oB8gBmNOwreI= >> =lFUs >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> _______________________________________________ >> osg-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org >> > > > > -- > Jordi Torres > > > -- Jordi Torres
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
