I suppose many regions have troubles to have a house numbers in OSM at all..
Dne 06/10/2016 v 08:47 Marko Mäkelä napsal(a): > Right, the user brain should be engaged. I think that one should > sometimes fine-adjust the location that you get from address search. > Do you want the goods delivery entrance, the mailbox, the main > entrance, some minor entrance, some specific corner of a parking lot, > a back yard, or what? These could make a difference also for car routing. > > I would argue that it is good mapping practice to attach the address > to the entrance=main node of the building, and to map access paths all > the way to that entrance=main. Then, by default, the address search > should perhaps return the entrance=main node. If there are multiple > nodes associated with an address, Osmand could ask the user to choose > the exact node. > > Perhaps even the map data could be improved further. Here is a related > example, a shop entrance in a fenced area whose only entrance is from > the west: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/458418466 > Some years ago when the parking aisles were not yet mapped, Garmin > would tell me to enter the area from the east and then climb the > fence. I don’t think it is reasonable to except any routing engine to > understand gates or fences. Only if the ‘last mile’ is properly > mapped, you can expect the routing engine to do the right thing. > > Marko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
