Hi Acee, Did you mean to say "would" rather than "would not" below?
I think this is a worthwhile project and I'd like to see it be a WG draft.
Thanks, Paul On 01/06/2011 02:40 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
Speaking as WG Co-Chair: At the last OSPF WG meeting, there was some interest in this draft. I'm now asking for opinions for and against. Speaking as a WG member: The authors (myself included) would not like to make this a WG draft. On the OSPF list and at the OSPF WG meeting, the only dissent was on along the lines of making IPsec (including IKEv2) work better with OSPFv3 rather than doing this. I don't disagree that this should be a goal but I don't think it should preclude this work. Thanks, Acee _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
