I am sure Acee meant that the he and the authors would like to see this draft adopted up as a WG draft.
I agree with that sentiment and would request this to be accepted as a WG document. We've had several mails in the past where this work was supported and none that was against. Cheers, Manav > -----Original Message----- > From: Acee Lindem [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 2.11 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); Vishwas Manral > Subject: Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3 > > Speaking as WG Co-Chair: > > At the last OSPF WG meeting, there was some interest in this > draft. I'm now asking for opinions for and against. > > Speaking as a WG member: > > The authors (myself included) would not like to make this a > WG draft. On the OSPF list and at the OSPF WG meeting, the > only dissent was on along the lines of making IPsec > (including IKEv2) work better with OSPFv3 rather than doing > this. I don't disagree that this should be a goal but I don't > think it should preclude this work. > > Thanks, > Acee _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
