+1 Mark
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Paul Wells <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Acee, > > Did you mean to say "would" rather than "would not" below? > > I think this is a worthwhile project and I'd like to see it be a WG draft. > > Thanks, > Paul > > On 01/06/2011 02:40 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: >> >> Speaking as WG Co-Chair: >> >> At the last OSPF WG meeting, there was some interest in this draft. I'm >> now asking for opinions for and against. >> >> Speaking as a WG member: >> >> The authors (myself included) would not like to make this a WG draft. On >> the OSPF list and at the OSPF WG meeting, the only dissent was on along the >> lines of making IPsec (including IKEv2) work better with OSPFv3 rather than >> doing this. I don't disagree that this should be a goal but I don't think it >> should preclude this work. >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSPF mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
