Folks,

The draft has been submitted as a WG document:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-00.txt

Cheers, Manav 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abhay Roy [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 4.57 AM
> To: Acee Lindem
> Cc: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); [email protected]; Vishwas Manral
> Subject: Re: [OSPF] Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3
> 
> There is sufficient support to make this a WG document.. 
> Manav, can you 
> please resubmit this with the new name..
> 
> Regards,
> -Abhay
> 
> On 1/7/11 7:09 AM, Acee Lindem wrote:
> > Actually I was just making sure everyone was paying 
> attention :^) Since I'm an author, I'll validate with Abhay 
> and Stewart but I think we can move forward and make this a 
> WG document.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Acee
> >
> > On Jan 6, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
> >
> >    
> >> I am sure Acee meant that the he and the authors would 
> like to see this draft adopted up as a WG draft.
> >>
> >> I agree with that sentiment and would request this to be 
> accepted as a WG document. We've had several mails in the 
> past where this work was supported and none that was against.
> >>
> >> Cheers, Manav
> >>
> >>      
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Acee Lindem [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 2.11 AM
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Cc: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); Vishwas Manral
> >>> Subject: Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3
> >>>
> >>> Speaking as WG Co-Chair:
> >>>
> >>> At the last OSPF WG meeting, there was some interest in this
> >>> draft. I'm now asking for opinions for and against.
> >>>
> >>> Speaking as a WG member:
> >>>
> >>> The authors (myself included) would not like to make this a
> >>> WG draft. On the OSPF list and at the OSPF WG meeting, the
> >>> only dissent was on along the lines of making IPsec
> >>> (including IKEv2) work better with OSPFv3 rather than doing
> >>> this. I don't disagree that this should be a goal but I don't
> >>> think it should preclude this work.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Acee
> >>>        
> > _______________________________________________
> > OSPF mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> >    
> 
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to