I would definitely like to see this work progressed and we must take it up as a WG item.
Glen On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote: > Speaking as WG Co-Chair: > > At the last OSPF WG meeting, there was some interest in this draft. I'm now > asking for opinions for and against. > > Speaking as a WG member: > > The authors (myself included) would not like to make this a WG draft. On the > OSPF list and at the OSPF WG meeting, the only dissent was on along the lines > of making IPsec (including IKEv2) work better with OSPFv3 rather than doing > this. I don't disagree that this should be a goal but I don't think it should > preclude this work. > > Thanks, > Acee > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
