There is sufficient support to make this a WG document.. Manav, can you
please resubmit this with the new name..
Regards,
-Abhay
On 1/7/11 7:09 AM, Acee Lindem wrote:
Actually I was just making sure everyone was paying attention :^) Since I'm an
author, I'll validate with Abhay and Stewart but I think we can move forward
and make this a WG document.
Thanks,
Acee
On Jan 6, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
I am sure Acee meant that the he and the authors would like to see this draft
adopted up as a WG draft.
I agree with that sentiment and would request this to be accepted as a WG
document. We've had several mails in the past where this work was supported and
none that was against.
Cheers, Manav
-----Original Message-----
From: Acee Lindem [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 2.11 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); Vishwas Manral
Subject: Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3
Speaking as WG Co-Chair:
At the last OSPF WG meeting, there was some interest in this
draft. I'm now asking for opinions for and against.
Speaking as a WG member:
The authors (myself included) would not like to make this a
WG draft. On the OSPF list and at the OSPF WG meeting, the
only dissent was on along the lines of making IPsec
(including IKEv2) work better with OSPFv3 rather than doing
this. I don't disagree that this should be a goal but I don't
think it should preclude this work.
Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
