On 10-Sep-2008, at 08:19, Charles Bennett wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2008, at 9:51 AM, LuKreme wrote:
>> You mean how he used the EXACT SAME PHRASE that McCain used LAST YEAR
>> about Hillary Clinton's Health care plan?
>>
>> Funny, it wasn't sexist then, but it is now?
>
> Because it wasn't then. Perception is everything in politics and
> Obama, of all people, should know that.
>
> Hillary hadn't done the pitbull/hockey mom lipstick comment the week
> before or it would have been perceived as sexist then too.
>
> The feminists are already pissed at Obama for his perceived diss of
> Hillary, so everything he says that can even remotely interpreted as
> sexist will be taken that way whether it is or not, and every word he
> utters about Palin will be looked over for the slightest insult.
I think he should lay into her every chance he gets. Call her a
fundamentalist wacko who does not represent anything near mainstream
religion in the US and hammer and hammer and hammer on her stand on
abortion and funding for teen pregnancy. Like I said, no woman who is
pro-choice is going to cross that line, as long as it is made very
clear the line is there.
"I don't think that girls who are gang-raped by their uncles and
fathers should have to carry the pregnancy to term, Palin does."
Repeat that every day until November and he'll win.
> Obama will no longer get the benefit of the doubt, *ever*, from them.
That's nice. Anyone who claimed to support Hillary and would even
consider voting for Palin is too stupid to be reliable.
>
--
"Katrina, $4 gas, a trillion dollar war, rising unemployment,
deregulated housing market, global warming...NO MORE!"
http://is.gd/2mxY
_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/
