further, calling it anything else would be confusing. This IS the 
technical term for this reference temperature.

C

On 9/9/2016 2:03 PM, Colin Law wrote:
> On 9 September 2016 at 15:20, Matthias Urlichs <matth...@urlichs.de> wrote:
>> On 09.09.2016 15:50, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>>>  So you mean that */temperature* should return the thermocouple temperature
>>>  and */thermocouple should vanish and */coldjunction (or a similar name)
>>>  should appear and  return the internal temperature?
>>>
>>> This sounds also much clearer to me and I will try to make a patch to the
>>> docs and the code, if I get confirmation that this approch is right.
>> For what it's worth, I can confirm that this makes sense.
>>> Any other ideas for a sensible filename to return internal temperature?
>> I'd use "reference_temperature" or some suitable abbreviation thereof.
>> Don't forget that this is not always the *cold* junction, you can use a
>> thermocouple to measure how cold your liquid nitrogen or CO2 is …
>
> Whether it is hotter or colder than the thermocouple it is still known
> as the cold junction.  If you call it that then anyone used to using
> thermocouples will know what you mean.
>
> Colin
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Owfs-developers mailing list
> Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to