Am Montag, dem 30.04.2012 um 23:21 schrieb Georg Ehrke: > Am 30.04.2012 um 23:20 schrieb Thomas Müller: > > > > > > > Am Montag, dem 30.04.2012 um 23:14 schrieb Georg Ehrke: > >> Another good point for Github is, > >> that a lot of 3rdparty projects we use are on github. > >> So we can easily fork them and contribute bug fixes we fixed. So every > >> project profit by it. > >> > > > > Agreed with one exception: forking is a nightmare from a maintainers point > > of view. > > The releases MUST be based on official release of 3rdparty projects. > > > > We don't want to maintain and ship our own versions of 3rdparty libs! > I meant that we fork the projects and send bug fixes so they put them into > their official releases.
Full ack I was assuming that - just wanted to point it out more explicit. > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > >> (3rdparty projects on github: jquery, ace editor, full calendar, when, > >> Sabre, …) > >> > >> Am 30.04.2012 um 22:56 schrieb Francois Lacroix: > >> > >>> I agree why not move to http://gitlabhq.com/ > >>> It is Open source and a github like > >>> > >>> On 30 avr. 2012, at 22:39, Tom Needham <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I'd also like to see us move over to Github for our repository hosting > >>>> and issue tracker. I think it would be hugely beneficial to have an > >>>> integrated issue tracker, where we can reference commits easily. As > >>>> Georg also said, we would get tracker for each repo which would really > >>>> help keep things organised. > >>>> > >>>> The current bug tracker (although functional) leaves a lot to be > >>>> desired, and with every update they seem to introduce a different bug. > >>>> Just look at http://bugs.owncloud.org/thebuggenie/issues/my if you > >>>> haven't already. The page load times are also becoming unacceptable. We > >>>> need to make it as easy as possible to keep things organised! > >>>> > >>>> If we moved to Github we would not have to worry about these problems > >>>> and the user management would be integrated. > >>>> > >>>> I know it will be a pain to move, but I think it will pay off with a > >>>> much better workflow afterwards. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Tom > >>>> > >>>> Tom Needham > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> On 30 Apr 2012, at 15:49, Georg Ehrke wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> I can only agree to Jan. > >>>>> > >>>>> Am 28.04.2012 um 22:43 schrieb Klaas Freitag: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 28.04.2012 22:21, Jan-Christoph Borchardt wrote: > >>>>>>> Not to open a can of worms (again), > >>>>>> lol > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> ..[Github is more hip and better].. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Software freedom – and in this case the freedom of the software we use > >>>>>>> for development – is just a means, not an end. Our goal is the freedom > >>>>>>> of others, that of the people we make the software for. And that can > >>>>>>> be achieved best& fastest by using Github and by leveraging a vast > >>>>>>> range of enthusiastic developers& designers which are, as it is, > >>>>>>> mostly on Github. > >>>>>> This discussion is the "vi or emacs" discussion of these days. What > >>>>>> you basically say is that for our goal to produce free software it > >>>>>> does not matter if the basics we use for that is free, as long its the > >>>>>> best. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I heard that 100x and still I don't buy it. It's wrong. Freedom > >>>>>> requires freedom, > >>>>> Linus actually hosted Linux on Github when kernel.org was down ;) > >>>>>> its not working otherwise. Thought into an extreme, look how nice > >>>>>> github could harm free software by simply switching off. > >>>>> Gitorious could switch off as well. > >>>>>> (Yes, I also know that git is de-central, but still, you get the idea. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Apart from that, I am tired of the discussion of course and don't > >>>>>> really care from where I do git pull. The argument against our > >>>>>> bugtracker however does not count for me here. > >>>>> I have to agree to Jan in this point too. Our Bugtracker works, but i > >>>>> would appreciate github issues. > >>>>> Further more we would have separated issue pages for the different > >>>>> repositories. (core, apps, desktop client, android client) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> regards, > >>>>>> Klaas > >>>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Georg > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Klaas Freitag<[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 27.04.2012 18:46, Georg Ehrke wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi Georg, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> btw. i was always interested why we use gitorious and not github? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I think (and hope) that is because gitorious is free software while > >>>>>>>> github > >>>>>>>> is propietory. That is a value for us. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> regards, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Klaas > >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>> Owncloud mailing list > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Owncloud mailing list > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Owncloud mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud > >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Owncloud mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
