Oh that’s just a pathetic attempt at a comeback.
So the contention ratio is 3000:1 for $6.66, which is what the original document thought was reasonable. Larger ISPs will have more CVCs to spread the load over. Halve it to 1500:1 and the cost will be $13.32. I think people would still pay that for access to a 1Gbps connection with an upgrade path to 10Gbps. Halve it again to 750:1 and the cost will be $26.64. I think people would be happy to pay that for a decent 1Gbps connection with an upgrade path to 10Gbps. Halve it again to 375:1 and the cost will be $53.28. So it costs $50 more to get access to 1Gbps on a lower contention ratio line with an upgrade path to 10Gbps. But now we have nothing but “what we’ve already got” for the next 20 years, with no upgrade path, but at a price tag of $50 billion dollars? Talk about a bunch of economic incompetents. This is nothing but economic vandalism. Thanks for that David. Thanks for suggesting to people that there was an alternative in the Liberal plan when there was none. Thanks for being a party to the damage it’s going to do to our country by not having a decent upgrade path for 20 years. I sure hope your blind one-eyed support was worth it. T. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Connors Sent: Monday, 16 December 2013 1:19 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: NBN Petition On 16 December 2013 09:01, Tony Wright <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: And why are you still ranting on about CVC. Most of us would have been happy to pay the extra $6.66 CVC fee to get a 1Gbps connection thanks. Yeah at 3000:1 contention ratio FTW (i.e 1/3 of a mbps per customer committed information rate per customer) ... which works out worse than ADSL2+ If 3000 people on your POI turn their IPTV on at once - you're stuffed. David.
