No, the fact that you went completely out of your way to shoot down the Labor 
NBN without a single critical word of the Liberal plan is what makes you 
partisan.

 

By the way, I got an email from Jon Dart suggesting that CVC is still in. 

He also made the statement “it is assumed that instead of decommissioning the 
HFC networks, Telstra and/or Optus would transfer ownership of the network.”

They’re going to hand over the networks for no cost apparently.

 

And $4 billion dollars to upgrade the system to FTTP in 13 years. Hmmm, 
believable. Not.

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of David Connors
Sent: Monday, 16 December 2013 10:23 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: NBN Petition

 

Come on - I thought that was a pretty good comeback. Anyway, who says I support 
the liberal plan? I am pretty sure I am on the record for saying the 
Commonwealth should not be spending any money on this except for structural and 
blackspot issues. 

 

Just because I called bullshit on Ken saying "Those in the HFC areas will end 
up with the worst of the possible options." doesn't automatically make me an 
advocate for the current government's plan. 

 

$52.38 is good value for 375:1 if you look at it on its own - but pretty much 
every ISP is on the record as saying something different... then again I guess 
they have those annoying pricks called shareholders to contend with. 

 

iiNet 

1.4million subscribers (2011 figures, could find 2013)

Market cap ~$960million

NPAT ~61million

 

CVC charges alone assuming we all get 1gbps for future 3D holographic frogs and 
shit:

3000:1: $112million per annum

375:1: $692million per annum

120:1 (same as a cheap provider today): $2.1 billion per annum

50:1 (same as a quality provider today): $5 billion per annum

 

I guess it is a good outcome that at 5500:1 could send their entire post tax 
profits to NBN Co. Anything better (for the consumers) than that then Korda 
Mentha will be paying them a visit. 

 

Even if you run the numbers of ADSL 2+ speeds:

50:1 = 161 million a year

100:1 = 80 million a year

(says they spend $30mil on dark fibre and peering costs so I'll give you a free 
kick by deducting the full $30million from the above when you make it balance).

 

I guess seeing as I think both parties are retarded means I am partisan. 

 

David. 

David Connors
 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] | M +61 417 189 363 
<tel:%2B61%20417%20189%20363> 
Download my v-card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors
Follow me on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/davidconnors
Connect with me on LinkedIn: http://au.linkedin.com/in/davidjohnconnors

 

On 16 December 2013 13:23, Tony Wright <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Oh that’s just a pathetic attempt at a comeback.

 

So the contention ratio is 3000:1 for $6.66, which is what the original 
document thought was reasonable. Larger ISPs will have more CVCs to spread the 
load over.

 

Halve it to 1500:1 and the cost will be $13.32. I think people would still pay 
that for access to a 1Gbps connection with an upgrade path to 10Gbps.

 

Halve it again to 750:1 and the cost will be $26.64. I think people would be 
happy to pay that for a decent 1Gbps connection with an upgrade path to 10Gbps.

 

Halve it again to 375:1 and the cost will be $53.28. So it costs $50 more to 
get access to 1Gbps on a lower contention ratio line with an upgrade path to 
10Gbps.

 

But now we have nothing but “what we’ve already got” for the next 20 years, 
with no upgrade path, but at a price tag of $50 billion dollars?

 

Talk about a bunch of economic incompetents. This is nothing but economic 
vandalism. 

 

Thanks for that David. Thanks for suggesting to people that there was an 
alternative in the Liberal plan when there was none. Thanks for being a party 
to the damage it’s going to do to our country by not having a decent upgrade 
path for 20 years. I sure hope your blind one-eyed support was worth it. 

 

T.

 

 

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
[mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] 
On Behalf Of David Connors
Sent: Monday, 16 December 2013 1:19 PM


To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: NBN Petition

 

On 16 December 2013 09:01, Tony Wright <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

And why are you still ranting on about CVC. Most of us would have been happy to 
pay the extra $6.66 CVC fee to get a 1Gbps connection thanks.

 

Yeah at 3000:1 contention ratio FTW (i.e 1/3 of a mbps per customer committed 
information rate per customer) ... which works out worse than ADSL2+

 

If 3000 people on your POI turn their IPTV on at once - you're stuffed. 

 

David. 

 

 

Reply via email to