Yep I did notice that in the core 2.0 update. Angular 2/4 never really felt right to me. Aurelia felt much better. I'll have to take a look at Vue now.
On Thursday, 24 August 2017, Tony Wright <tonyw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interestingly, dot net core 2.0, which was released a couple of weeks ago, > only supports react,react+redux and angular 2/4 in its spa templates. They > will work against pure dot net core as well as dot net framework. Both Vue > and react are view only and require a dog's breakfast of technologies to > make up the stack, hence the inclusion of redux, which is now part of > Facebooks offering. Angular is the most complete/enterprise ready of all > the frameworks, but it has its own impediments, predominantly being it's > stupid syntax. Vue is out performing both angular and react at the moment > on github. But stars can be rigged, so I'm prepared to wait a bit longer > before taking a more serious look. > > T. > > On 24 Aug 2017 5:29 PM, "Greg Keogh" <gfke...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gfke...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/which-javascript-framework-sh >>> ould-i-choose-enterprise-tony-wright >>> >> >> Nice summary, but it seems to confirm my fears that the JS ecosystem is >> still devolving into more fragments. I mean, oh lord, not another one ... >> Vue.js -- *GK* >> >
