Yep I resisted for a long time and stayed with winforms lol but am now
forced to look at this stuff.

On Thursday, 24 August 2017, Tony Wright <tonyw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> After doing all the research I chose angular for my current enterprise
> application. I had to choose a technology that could withstand an assault
> from people who are still in a  circa 2000 mindset. It's non trivial but
> will do everything I need it to. There's so much to learn just to get going
> on any of the frameworks.
>
> Part of the decision to go with angular is also the proliferation of
> angular 1 apps out there, which was chosen pretty much for the same
> reasons. There will still be years of support required for Angular 1 apps,
> and much work converting them to angular 2, which is really the only path
> available for those apps.
>
> When I first decided to learn angular it was because there were no jobs at
> the time for my traditional Microsoft tech stack. At the time it freaked me
> out as I recognised that the world had moved on and I had to quickly get on
> board or be dead in the water. I analysed the market, figured out where the
> jobs were and viola, the rest is history.
>
>
>
> On 24 Aug 2017 6:39 PM, "Tom Rutter" <therut...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','therut...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Yep I did notice that in the core 2.0 update. Angular 2/4 never really
>> felt right to me. Aurelia felt much better. I'll have to take a look at Vue
>> now.
>>
>> On Thursday, 24 August 2017, Tony Wright <tonyw...@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tonyw...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Interestingly, dot net core 2.0, which was released a couple of weeks
>>> ago, only supports react,react+redux and angular 2/4 in its spa templates.
>>> They will work against pure dot net core as well as dot net framework. Both
>>> Vue and react are view only and require a dog's breakfast of technologies
>>> to make up the stack, hence the inclusion of redux, which is now part of
>>> Facebooks offering. Angular is the most complete/enterprise ready of all
>>> the frameworks, but it has its own impediments, predominantly being it's
>>> stupid syntax. Vue is out performing both angular and react at the moment
>>> on github. But stars can be rigged, so I'm prepared to wait a bit longer
>>> before taking a more serious look.
>>>
>>> T.
>>>
>>> On 24 Aug 2017 5:29 PM, "Greg Keogh" <gfke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/which-javascript-framework-sh
>>>>> ould-i-choose-enterprise-tony-wright
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nice summary, but it seems to confirm my fears that the JS ecosystem is
>>>> still devolving into more fragments. I mean, oh lord, not another one ...
>>>> Vue.js -- *GK*
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to