After doing all the research I chose angular for my current enterprise application. I had to choose a technology that could withstand an assault from people who are still in a circa 2000 mindset. It's non trivial but will do everything I need it to. There's so much to learn just to get going on any of the frameworks.
Part of the decision to go with angular is also the proliferation of angular 1 apps out there, which was chosen pretty much for the same reasons. There will still be years of support required for Angular 1 apps, and much work converting them to angular 2, which is really the only path available for those apps. When I first decided to learn angular it was because there were no jobs at the time for my traditional Microsoft tech stack. At the time it freaked me out as I recognised that the world had moved on and I had to quickly get on board or be dead in the water. I analysed the market, figured out where the jobs were and viola, the rest is history. On 24 Aug 2017 6:39 PM, "Tom Rutter" <therut...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yep I did notice that in the core 2.0 update. Angular 2/4 never really > felt right to me. Aurelia felt much better. I'll have to take a look at Vue > now. > > On Thursday, 24 August 2017, Tony Wright <tonyw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Interestingly, dot net core 2.0, which was released a couple of weeks >> ago, only supports react,react+redux and angular 2/4 in its spa templates. >> They will work against pure dot net core as well as dot net framework. Both >> Vue and react are view only and require a dog's breakfast of technologies >> to make up the stack, hence the inclusion of redux, which is now part of >> Facebooks offering. Angular is the most complete/enterprise ready of all >> the frameworks, but it has its own impediments, predominantly being it's >> stupid syntax. Vue is out performing both angular and react at the moment >> on github. But stars can be rigged, so I'm prepared to wait a bit longer >> before taking a more serious look. >> >> T. >> >> On 24 Aug 2017 5:29 PM, "Greg Keogh" <gfke...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/which-javascript-framework-sh >>>> ould-i-choose-enterprise-tony-wright >>>> >>> >>> Nice summary, but it seems to confirm my fears that the JS ecosystem is >>> still devolving into more fragments. I mean, oh lord, not another one ... >>> Vue.js -- *GK* >>> >>
