On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Bob Ebert wrote:
> In case 1, we won't say anything because we can't comment on stuff that
> hasn't been officially announced. In case 2, we won't say anything because
> there's nothing to say.
>
> All I was doing was pointing out that case 1 exists. And trying to be
> careful to do so without saying which case is actually true. ...lawyers...
> :)
I'd guess that it's case 2 for the reasons I have stated.
> >It appears that you ARE interested in getting at people who tell the
> >truth. Many have posted emails, from 3com, indicating that "this
> >streaking is acceptable considering the improvements made...".
>
> Well, I looked back through this thread any I found only one other post
> from a 3Com person, Jesse Donaldson, who says why the error occurs. Did I
> miss something? Specifics would really help here.
Indeed you have. Several people have posted emails from 3com. Usually
I don't put much stock in such posts but I contacted 3com via email and
got the exact same response that was posted. So, while 3com may not
have directly posted to the newsgroup, they have email to individuals who
contacted them.
And what I have stated it what they have said. The streaking is
acceptable considering the many improvements made....etc, etc.
Bottom line is that they keep shipping units that streak.
> >IF YOU say they DO care. Then lets see an official comment about
> >this streaking where they indicate they are working on a fix. Or
> >anything besides, it's acceptable.
>
> I'll see what I can do.
>
> --Bob
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Bob Ebert, Sr. Software Engineer, Palm Computing Inc., 3Com Corporation
> V: 408 326-9299 5400 Bayfront Plaza, MS: 10212, Santa Clara, CA, 95052
> F: 408 326-9891, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferred: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------
Shoot-to-Win
Protect the 2nd Amendment
----------------------------------------------------
