<< Given that, I can't think of a single reason why Apple wouldn't be begging to use these new IBM processors. :) >>
Actually, I can. We know Apple has been keeping OSX ruuning on Intel chips. We know that OSX is multiprocessor aware. We know OS9 won't be bootable after this next January. I ask you, just how fast would a Mac be, if it was running on 2 (I'd like to see at least 4) or more Intel 3.0 Ghz chips. How fast would it be compared to Windows on ONE 3.0 Ghz Intel chip. Would that squash FOREVER the rumor of PC's being faster than Macs? (Incidentally, I'm not fond of Intel, hate MicroShaft and have always liked Motorola) Just thinkin' STeve -- PCI-PowerMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- Sonnet & PowerLogix Upgrades - start at $169 | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> PCI-PowerMacs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/pci-powermacs.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:pci-powermacs@;mail.maclaunch.com> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:pci-powermacs-off@;mail.maclaunch.com> For digest mode, email: <mailto:pci-powermacs-digest@;mail.maclaunch.com> Subscription questions: <mailto:listmom@;lowendmac.com> Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/pci-powermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
