Thanks Jim. I found a Leica lens site. It supports your opinion.
However, it also gives fairly high grades to the Summitar. I may go that
way if I can get a good price. The site is at http://www.cameraquest.com/ltmlens.htm
Paul

Jim Apilado wrote:
> 
> I believe the Summicron is the best.  Many of the early Leitz lenses were
> not coated so this is something to look for.  When I attend swap meets I
> rarely see any screw mount Leica stuff, especially lenses.  I heard, once,
> that many Leica collectors in Japan have purchased a lot of the good stuff.
> I like rangefinder photography.
> 
> Jim A.
> 
> > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 07:37:08 +0000
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: OT: Leica Lust
> > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Resent-Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 07:37:48 -0500
> >
> > Nice. Everything was a lot cheaper back then. I bought a Nikon SP2
> > rangefinder for $75 in the early seventies. By the way, the lens I'm
> > currently looking at is a Leitz Summitar. I notice I've seen Leitz
> > Elmar, Summicron, and Summitar 5 cm lenses in fifties vintage screw
> > mount. Do you know which is generally considered superior?
> > Paul
> >
> > Jim Apilado wrote:
> >>
> >> I got interested in Leicas back in the late Sixties when I saw a man at
> >> wedding pull a small camera from his pocket that had a collapsible lens.  It
> >> was a Leica IIIf.  Back then Leicas could be had for a steal.  I found one
> >> for sale for $90 that included a 5cm Elmar lens and a 35mm Nikkor lens in
> >> screw mount.
> >> At a swap meet I attended today, Saturday,  a dealer had several Leica
> >> clones from the old Soviet Union.  I have one FED Russian Leica.  For awhile
> >> I sought out Leica copies, like Canons, and Niccas.
> >> A couple of years ago I was able to handle some really rare Leicas, namely a
> >> dial Compur shutter Leica and a Leica 250.  The owner let me look at his
> >> treasure trove when he noticed I was using a Leica M2 to photograph a
> >> wedding.
> >>
> >> Jim A.
> >>
> >>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 23:05:45 +0000
> >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Subject: Re: OT: Leica Lust
> >>> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Resent-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 23:06:22 -0500
> >>>
> >>> I'm in the process of hunting down a Summicrom 5cm. They are fairly
> >>> common. The IIIg seems to be quite rare and expensive. My Russian clone
> >>> has a copy of an Elmar 5/3.5. That's a collapsible lens as well. The
> >>> Russian clone is actually pretty good at f8 and smaller.
> >>> Paul
> >>>
> >>> Jim Apilado wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> My favorite screw mount Leica is the IIIg, the last model.  It came with
> >>>> the Summicron collaspsible 5cm lens that really made the camera pockable.
> >>>> Another neat screw mount I have is a Yashica YF.  It is similar to the
> >>>> M-Leicas but has the old rotating shutter selector and the screw mount.
> >>>> When
> >>>> the Japanese came out with the modern screw mount cameras  I regretted
> >>>> selling some of my old screw mount lenses.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jim A.
> >>>>
> >>>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 15:48:08 +0000
> >>>>> To: Pentax Discuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>> Subject: OT: Leica Lust
> >>>>> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> Resent-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 15:48:45 -0500
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Some of you may remember that I bought a Russian Leica Clone at a camera
> >>>>> flea market last week. I really like the feel of that thing. I had a
> >>>>> Nikon rangefinder 25 years ago and loved it dearly, but it had been a
> >>>>> long time since I had held an RF camera. Well, the Russian clone won me
> >>>>> over and today I bought a CIII screwmount Leica. Nice toy for a fairly
> >>>>> modest investment. It's here:
> >>>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2913669167&category=300
> >>>>> 30
> >>>>> Paul
> >>>>> (Not ready for the Leica list :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >

Reply via email to