Quoting William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ernreed said: > > We've established many times, including quite recently, that we > > cannot reach > > a consensus on what makes a "pro" camera. > > Thats cause the camera isn't all there is to whether it is pro or > not. > The company has to offer stellar support service as well. > Pentax is a bit spotty in this regard. >....
Meaning then that according to your standards, the LX isn't a "pro" camera either? I mean, just to be clear, this got underway because of the claim that the LX was the last 35mm pro camera Pentax made, and my opinion that the PZ-1 and PZ- 1p also qualify. If it's your opinion that the company has to stand behind it and therefore there's no such thing as a Pentax 35mm pro camera, okay, I understand your reasoning. ERN
