I used to care about camera features a lot...but not anymore... As long as it allows me to take pictures, it's fine by me! It matters to me the most is whether I take good pictures or even great photos! I took some photos I consider excellent with LX. I did that with ME Super and MZ-50 too! I'm sure if I was given a "Pro" camera such as Canon 1Ds MK2, given the right circumstances, I can get great pics too! It's just a tool... what matters is your imagination...
Cheers Andy -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 9:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pro cameras again.....SHEESH. was: Re: New Guy Quoting William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ernreed said: > > We've established many times, including quite recently, that we > > cannot reach > > a consensus on what makes a "pro" camera. > > Thats cause the camera isn't all there is to whether it is pro or > not. > The company has to offer stellar support service as well. > Pentax is a bit spotty in this regard. >.... Meaning then that according to your standards, the LX isn't a "pro" camera either? I mean, just to be clear, this got underway because of the claim that the LX was the last 35mm pro camera Pentax made, and my opinion that the PZ-1 and PZ- 1p also qualify. If it's your opinion that the company has to stand behind it and therefore there's no such thing as a Pentax 35mm pro camera, okay, I understand your reasoning. ERN
