There is no such thing as a "digital look". A digital image can look like anything, including a perfect emulation of whatever grain floats your boat.
Godfrey --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Shel is right. The look of film is more than just grain. But > it's not a lot more than just grain. I've been showing my book > to some art buyers for major ad agencies and some > photographers reps. At the mement, the color pics in my book > is a mix of digital and medium format printed at 11 x17. All > of the prints are inkjet. The film prints were scanned from > the 6x78 negs. I find that even the most knowledgable critics > are frequently unable to distinguish the digital from the > medium format film. That's not to say that there are no > differences, but they are minimal to be sure. > Paul > > > > My feelings exactly. If you want the look of film (which is > more than just > > grain) then shoot film. If you want a digital look, shoot > digital. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
