TriX looks like what it does because of the defects of Tri-X
film. No digital camera I know of has been designed to produce a
photograph with defects emulating Tri-X.
Define a "digital look". If you mean grainless, clean
photographs, you are not defining a digital look; you're saying
what film is supposed to be trying to produce.
Godfrey
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's just about the most absurd comment I've read here
> recently ... there
> is a definite look to digital images when they come out of the
> camera.
> Then, after you muck around with them in Photoshop and
> whatever, they may
> take on a different look. Show me a digital camera that will
> produce Tri-X
> tonality and grain structure right out of the box. Perhaps
> you meant to
> say that a digital image can BE MADE to look like anything ...
>
>
> Shel
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > There is no such thing as a "digital look". A digital image
> can
> > look like anything, including a perfect emulation of
> whatever
> > grain floats your boat.
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com
