William Robb wrote:


----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian"
Subject: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax...



I'm not being negative about Pentax quality. I used their gear for 20 years and it always performed great. I was only clarifying what I think Mr. Robb was referring to when he said "performance over the past 35 years." not performance of the available gear - that's always been top-notch, but performance as a company to offer what some people want: technological innovation, etc.


I like quality camera equipment. In 1975, I bought a Nikon F2s for professional use. The cameras that Pentax was offering at the time were a joke by comparison, and the F2 had been around for six years already.

I don't know much about the cameras of 1975, but are you sure that was because they couldn't, and not because they wouldn't? Perhaps Pentax produced cameras that were a joke because joke cameras was their line of business? Shouldn't you compare the quality with Nikons targeted for the joke market? Are Peugeot (it's the car I drive) behind, say, Honda because Honda unveiled a new formula one car last year, and Peugeot hasn't responded yet - when they don't have a formula one team in the first place (I think)?

They have been consistently outclassed in real world camera performance and build quality since the late 1960s.

William Robb




Reply via email to