On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 12:37:04AM -0800, David wrote:
 
> 6) I don't have a single AF lens with a faster f stop than 3.2.  Guess I 
> can't shoot action anymore :-(

That's the most ridiculous "complaint" in the diatribe
(although, I admit, there's some pretty tough competition).

Once you get out beyond 100mm, it's hard to find anybody with a
lens that's faster than f2.8  I think I've seen some of them listed
at B&H, but I've never seen one in the field.  I've seen lots of
300m/f2.8 and 400mm/f2.8 lenses (and 600mm/f4), but nothing faster
than f2.8  For shorter focal lengths it's very common to see the
80-200 and 28-80 zooms, most of which again are only f2.8.  In
fact I probably see as many of the great Canon 35-350 superzoom,
and that's not even f2.8.  Then, of course, there's the really
short stuff - 12-24/f4 zooms seem very popular with APS-C sensors.

And that's just the big-budget, full-time professional shooters.
Among the part time, advanced amateur or semi-pro guys there's
a good scattering of 100-300/f4, 80-400/f5.6, and the like.
And I still like my 250-600, even though it's only f5.6

Reply via email to