As a person who has started a major flame war through the use of an
inflammatory sig line, and who has participated in many OT discussions on
religion and philosophy, you are being deeply hypocritical.
John
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:34:52 -0000, Colin J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul,
You might find it amusing but it is completely
and utterly pointless.
It is a great pity, because the members of this
List collectively hold a wealth of knowledge and
experience. Whenever I have asked specific
technical questions here I have been deeply
impressed by the quality of the replies, and I
have not hesitated to act on advice given.
A few weeks ago on here, the List owner was
bemoaning the difficulty he was having convincing
Pentax that this List was useful to the company
as a means of obtaining user feedback and
indications of user requirements for future
products. In the light of the latest flame war,
following closely on the heels of a seemingly
never-ending debate about religion, is it any
wonder Pentax doesn't take this List seriously?
What the List really needs is effective
moderation that would curtail childish nonsense
long before it gets to this stage. Until that
happens, Pentax would be wasting their time
listening to us.
Colin
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 06:35:09 -0500
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: which camera to buy?
Message-Id:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
This version of the thread -- an aperture ring
flame war -- is quite
amusing.
Paul
___________________________________________________________
Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now.
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/blackberry
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
