I agree entirely. I should have stated "being an amateur photographer".
My point was that this could be impetus for additional fees for the park
user.
Kenneth Waller
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: Paying to shoot in US National Parks
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Waller"
Subject: Re: Re: Paying to shoot in US National Parks
I have no issue with the current pay for admission in our national parks,
however to have to pay because I'm a photographer taking pictures would
really irk me. Think of what could then be charged for in the parks:
- gee you're having lunch in the park, that will be an additional $$$$.
- you'll be hiking 12 miles, that'll be an additional $$$$
I think the point is that if you are engaging in a profitable activity,
they want a cut.
Taking a picture as an amateur isn't a problem, but teaching a photo
seminar for pay might be.
Having lunch in the park is no problem, setting up a hot dog cart might
raise some eyebrows.
William Robb
