Dig away. On Sep 15, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Tom C wrote: > > Why was I riduculed then? You want me to dig them out? > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > >> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:44:44 -0400 >> >> That's the biggest crock of BS I've ever seen on the list. We've all >> been clamoring for a higher resolution camera for a long time. I >> would say it's unanimous. On the other hand, many of us did point out >> that the 6 MP cameras worked very well. There's a difference that you >> apparently don't understand. >> Paul >> On Sep 15, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Tom C wrote: >> >>> I've got emails saved from 3 months back when a lot of you guys were >>> ridiculing me for wanting more than a 6MP DSLR and saying I thought >>> it was >>> foolish for Pentax to continue making them, and how you were >>> TOTALLY HAPPY >>> and SATISFIED with your 6MP Pentax. Now your all in line to buy a >>> new one! >>> >>> *IF* Pentax Japan actually listens to this list and takes seriously >>> the >>> views expressed here (which I highly doubt), then you actually owe >>> all the >>> 'negative', 'whining', ' Chicken Little's' on this list a 'Thank >>> you' for >>> theor voice, because otherwise you'd convince Pentax to kep on >>> churning out >>> more of the same. >>> >>> Now, that's a hoot. >>> >>> Tom C. >>> >>> >>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >>>> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:05:46 -0400 >>>> >>>> Rob, you're a hoot. First you complain that the Pentax offerings >>>> aren't good enough. Now, you're complaining that they're too good. >>>> HAR! >>>> >>>> On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 15/09/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sheesh, for now take some pleasure and pride in what Pentax is >>>>>> trying to do >>>>>> here, that the camera is ore a leader than anything Pentax has >>>>>> produced in >>>>>> a long time, accept that the company may never really compete >>>>>> with >>>>>> Canon in >>>>>> terms of numbers, enjoy the concept of forwards and backwards >>>>>> lens >>>>>> compatibility, check out the camera when it arrives in your >>>>>> area, and >>>>>> decide if it's worthwhile for you. >>>>> >>>>> It's the likely excessive demand that they are creating that >>>>> has me >>>>> worried, the price point has got people from all aver the place >>>>> interested. The point is that they can't compete with Canon >>>>> numbers, >>>>> we all know this. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rob Studdert >>>>> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA >>>>> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 >>>>> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ >>>>> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
