this question cannot be answered without your telling what's your final output. e.g. for web galleries, either one is an overkill. for projected slides, imo, digital doesn't come anywhere close. for prints -- i don't know, i supose that depends on the size...
best, mishka On 9/20/06, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am considering selling my MF ( 6x6) gear to help finance the K10D. > Does the new 10MP camera with 22 bit colour depth mean it's time to ditch > the 120-roll film equipment? > Can I get the same image quality and resolution with the K10D? > > PS: > I three years time the K10D will have lost as much value (close to all of > it) as I have saved (cost of 120 film, development etc.) - during the same > period of time. > I other words - there's really no economical gain in switching to digital - > over a relative short period of time. Over a longer period there isn't > either - because digital cameras get obsolete in 3-4 years Eventually I'll > buy a new camera more often, than I had to, using film (film cameras lasted > 10-20 years) In other words -it's not an economical qestion. It's a question > of image quality today. Not considering that film/developing options may > disappear anytime soon. > > Regards > Jens Bladt > http://www.jensbladt.dk > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/450 - Release Date: 09/18/2006 > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
