A Norwegian reviewer noted that the K100D was almost identical to *istDs and very good. He also has some negative notes regarding the testing on dpreview. So maybe we are giving Askey too much credit.
DagT Den 15. des. 2006 kl. 20.32 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi: > Sometimes I wonder what's going on in his mind. He lambasted the DS > for JPEG quality where the defaults were optimized for direct output > to a 4x6 inch print, and did beautifully at it. Now he doesn't like > the K10D's gentle JPEG defaults, designed for post processing > flexibility. > > But as I've said before, his opinions do not concern me. I look at > the reviews for pictures of the equipment and a detail list of > functions/features. > > G > > On Dec 15, 2006, at 11:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Once again, Phil gets hung up on Pentax's modest in-camera >> sharpening of jpegs. I guess that's because it's easy to see when >> you pixel peep. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
