Especially if you resize for web as part of your process. -Adam
John Forbes wrote: > I suspect that people who don't shoot RAW don't realise that it is not > very time-consuming at all once you get the hang of it, and provided you > use good software. > > I use Silkypix, having changed over from Capture One LE. I find that I > can get better colour balance with Silkypix than I could with C1, and the > batch processing means that it takes very little time to convert 100 or > more images. > > In most cases I can then save to JPEG without having to use a conventional > image editor like Photoshop. > > John > > > > On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:50:19 -0000, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Hi Ken >> but would'nt TIF be the ideal solution then? >> greetings >> Markus >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >> K.Takeshita >> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 5:08 AM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: K10D review online >> >> >> On 12/15/06 11:00 PM, "K.Takeshita", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>> Shooting JPEG is >>>> like buying a Ferrari and driving at 30mph. >>> Not necessarily. >> What I meant is that, getting the best possible results from jpeg right >> out >> of camera, not leaving everything with post-processing, requires skill >> and >> understanding of what you are doing. >> >> But then, there are many who do not even know what RAW means and just >> shoot >> with whatever they have like P&S, spitting out jpeg only. And that's OK. >> That's their style and as long as they are happy and can enjoy >> photography..... >> Some jpeg outputs are pretty good these days, DigiRebels for example >> produce pretty good jpeg which appeal to average mass (Canon deliberately >> tune so anyway). >> >> Ken >> >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
