Why should I "accept" an opposing opinion (especailly one I STRONGLY oppose) I that dont believe in or cannot be backed up with a good factual argument to support it. I wont and never will. Its called conviction. I dont expect everyone to agree with me on everything, and many many things are gray which I avoid. But to expect me to just "accept" anything else without good cause is simply crazy. And secondly, I honestly believe that there are people posting here opposing viewpoints they dont even believe in just to oppose me no matter what I post. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Perry Pellechia Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 2:17 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Please everyone set up an email filter Tim, I agree that is takes two people to have an argument. However, it is hard for people to have self control and continue to read endless nonsense being throw onto the list without wanting to fight back. Just look at the threads that have exploded in recent days. One person after another make a run at someone who cannot accept an opposing opinion. Soon there are 1000 messages filled with cursing and rage. This leads to people leaving the group because they do not want to put up with the bickering. How many people have stopped posting because of the current atmosphere? The point of filtering out someone's email is not to kill free speech. It is to remove unnecessary distractions from the content provided by others that have something to contribute. Like the TV analogy. When it is showing something you do not want to see; you turn to a different channel (or you turn it off). In other words, you might have the freedom to speak, but no one has to listen. As for filtering out your email: I am sure if you start behaving like the person I am blocking there will be many people adding your name to their kill file. Perry. On 12/19/06, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This may not make me popular here, but I'll take the risk. I feel like > defending "you know who" a bit. > > Ok, "you know who" has been involved in a lot of arguments. "You know > who" has also been very persistent in his argumentation. His language > has been a bit over the top. And, I got to admit that "you know who" > has pissed me of at several occasions. > > I could go on like this for a long time, but in the name of justice; I > have never seen a fight with one single person involved, not before, > not now, nor in future. It's simply impossible to fight on you own. > Other has been persistent too, others has been a bit over the top and > so on. > > And our friend Ken has a valid point. He said something about pushing > "you know who"'s buttons, just to make him go wild. Ok, this has > turned "you know who" into a loose canon on deck. But I mean that > trying to lunch him out like this is unfair, and a bit unwise. > > I think we have another problem than "you know who". I think it is > something that is wrong. I think there is a lot of frustration on the > list now, and I not sure it is only because of "you know who". To be > honest: I have no idea what this other source of frustration is. It > could be the winter on northern hemisphere, it could be because of the > waiting for the K10D, or envy of those who has the K10D, it could be > anything. But I don't think it is possible to point out one single > reason. > > Come on guys. "You know who" has a temper, yes. He can be a PITA, yes. > But so can I. I know I have been. "You know who" his personal style, > he repeats every argument three times (therefore I read just every > forth post from "you know who" ;-)). But so have I. > > Why not filtering me out? (Ok, for all that I know, I can be filtered > out from many of you. I guess I will be after this post ;-) > > Ok. I'll stop there, with repeating my main point: It always takes two > to fight. There is one picker, but also one taker. > > Note my one time signature ;-) > > > Tim, next guy to be filtered out. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Perry Pellechia > Sent: 18. desember 2006 18:22 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Please everyone set up an email filter > > Please stop responding to you know who. > > Please learn how set up your email client to filter out all email from > him. > > It is really the only way to bring civility back to the list. > > You cannot win. If you disagree with him you are WRONG. If you agree > with him you are also WRONG. Do not get sucked in to these endless > and pointless diatribes. > > If you need help setting up your email client, ask for help. I am > sure there are enough people here that can help. > > > > -- > <----------------------------------------------------> > Perry Pellechia > > Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry > <----------------------------------------------------> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- <----------------------------------------------------> Perry Pellechia Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry <----------------------------------------------------> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
