Oh, I'm (mostly) happy with the results I get from the *ist-D. The problem comes with the shots I *don't* get, for a variety of reasons (the most common ones being failure of the AF system to achieve a lock fast enough in low light/low contrast scenes, or the buffer filling up during a multi-shot sequence).
I see the K10D as primarily an improvement in ergonomics, not a needed upgrade for better image quality. On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 07:55:14PM -0800, Jim Apilado wrote: > I, too, am satisfied with the results I get from *ist D. I like to read the > material from Pentax users who can't wait to move up to the latest toy. > > Jim A. > > > From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > > Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 19:38:21 -0800 > > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > > Subject: Re: More rumors ... (and happy New Year) > > > > One needn't upgrade a DSLR if it's providing the desired results. In fact, > > since I'm mostly just making snap shots these days, I was wondering of I > > really need the K10D. I sure want one, and will probably get one, but thus > > far I've not done any DSLR work that makes the 10D necessary. > > > > Shel > > > > > > > >> [Original Message] > >> From: Scott Loveless > > > >> Just shoot film. There is no treadmill. And no upgrade path, either. > >> > >> Have a nice day! > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
