I've heard that Boris's Russian countryman, Alexander Solzenitzen,
thought the gulags would have been a lot emptier in their day if the
secret police were uncertain which of their middle of the night raids
would have been met with a loaded gun.
Regards,  Bob S.

On 1/10/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well my point (even though I'm not anti-gun) is that it's better for no one
> to be armed than anybody to be armed. That's what logic dictates to me.
>
> Rather than fighting violence with violence, find a way to stop the
> violence.  That's also logical.
>
> Tom C.
>
>
> >From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
> >Subject: Re: PESO - American Fence
> >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:34:22 -0500
> >
> >There is a matter of proportion however nuclear weapons are more the
> >province of governments.  A single person with a gun is unlikely to kill
> >a lot of people before they're stopped, (by my definition of a lot
> >anyway).  A government with an army and a lot of guns, or a single
> >nuclear weapon can kill a whole lot of people.  For that reason alone I
> >believe logic dictates tis better for individuals to be armed and
> >governments to be disarmed.
> >
> >Tom C wrote:
> > > Guns kill just like nuclear weapons kill.  In fact guns have killed more
> > > people than nuclear weapons... so far.
> > >
> > > In retrospect, *probably* both inventions were a bad idea.  They have
> >both
> > > led to untold injury, death, and suffering.  Their purpose is largely,
> >to
> > > kill, unlike other inventions which may endanger life.
> > >
> > > Am I anti-gun?  No.  Just making a point.  Sure this is simplistic, but
> >the
> > > truth often is.
> > >
> > > Tom C.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
> > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
> > >> Subject: Re: PESO - American Fence
> > >> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:35:12 -0500
> > >>
> > >> Sorry, I must disagree.  An armed victim is more likely to defend
> > >> herself than a disarmed victim.  To paraphrase a member of the English
> > >> House of Lords in the losing battle against the handgun ban in GB.
> > >> 'Firearms are used to defend the weak against the strong.  To restrict
> > >> their use by citizens is to deny them the right to self defense.
> > >> Governments may have the power to do that, but should not have the
> > >> right.'  Apparently the British Government no longer believes in the
> > >> Citizens right of self defense.  Do you?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> William Robb wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>> From: "P. J. Alling" Subject: Re: PESO - American Fence
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hand guns don't cause crime, if that were true once Great Britain
> > >>>>
> > >> banned
> > >>
> > >>>> all hand guns, (and made shotgun ownership much more difficult),
> > >>>>
> > >> violent
> > >>
> > >>>> crime would have been eliminated, in fact it increased, (violent
> >crime
> > >>>> rates in England are now higher than in the US).  I doubt that
> > >>>>
> > >> smuggling
> > >>
> > >>>> firearms is the cause of violent crime in Canada, it's a symptom of
> > >>>> something else.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> Straw man argument, Peter.
> > >>> Gun crimes are more likely to end up with the victim being more
> > >>>
> > >> seriously
> > >>
> > >>> hurt or dead than other types of weapons crimes, and can be used at
> > >>>
> > >> range
> > >>
> > >>> where the victim has less chance of self defence.
> > >>>
> > >>> William Robb
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> --
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
> > >>                    -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >> PDML@pdml.net
> > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >--
> >--
> >
> >The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
> >                       -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
> >
> >
> >--
> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >PDML@pdml.net
> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to