Not really, since a drunk being arrested makes a lot of noise as well.  
But he still gets arrested, it's not usually worthwhile to have a gun 
battle to avoid a night in the drunk tank.  The neighbors will look at 
it the same way.  Blowing up the apartment next door is messy and 
bureaucrats hate messy.

DagT wrote:
> Then it would have been enough to make some noise to avoid the  
> arrest, wouldn´t it?
>
> Anyway, gas is silent and the Russians used it recently in the  
> theater hostage affair.  Remember?
>
> DagT
>
> Den 10. jan. 2007 kl. 23.25 skrev P. J. Alling:
>
>   
>> Nothing really, no I take that back.  The secret police prefer to work
>> in silence, grenades are so publicly noisy, and hard to ignore.
>>
>> DagT wrote:
>>     
>>> Great idea!  What would stop them from throwing in a hand grenade
>>> instead, or some gas?  Sure, the camps would have been emptier.
>>>
>>> DagT
>>>
>>> Den 10. jan. 2007 kl. 21.48 skrev Bob Sullivan:
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> I've heard that Boris's Russian countryman, Alexander Solzenitzen,
>>>> thought the gulags would have been a lot emptier in their day if the
>>>> secret police were uncertain which of their middle of the night  
>>>> raids
>>>> would have been met with a loaded gun.
>>>> Regards,  Bob S.
>>>>
>>>> On 1/10/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Well my point (even though I'm not anti-gun) is that it's better
>>>>> for no one
>>>>> to be armed than anybody to be armed. That's what logic dictates
>>>>> to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rather than fighting violence with violence, find a way to stop the
>>>>> violence.  That's also logical.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom C.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: PESO - American Fence
>>>>>> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:34:22 -0500
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a matter of proportion however nuclear weapons are  
>>>>>> more the
>>>>>> province of governments.  A single person with a gun is unlikely
>>>>>> to kill
>>>>>> a lot of people before they're stopped, (by my definition of a lot
>>>>>> anyway).  A government with an army and a lot of guns, or a single
>>>>>> nuclear weapon can kill a whole lot of people.  For that reason
>>>>>> alone I
>>>>>> believe logic dictates tis better for individuals to be armed and
>>>>>> governments to be disarmed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom C wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Guns kill just like nuclear weapons kill.  In fact guns have
>>>>>>> killed more
>>>>>>> people than nuclear weapons... so far.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In retrospect, *probably* both inventions were a bad idea.  They
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> both
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> led to untold injury, death, and suffering.  Their purpose is
>>>>>>> largely,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> kill, unlike other inventions which may endanger life.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am I anti-gun?  No.  Just making a point.  Sure this is
>>>>>>> simplistic, but
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> truth often is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tom C.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: PESO - American Fence
>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:35:12 -0500
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry, I must disagree.  An armed victim is more likely to  
>>>>>>>> defend
>>>>>>>> herself than a disarmed victim.  To paraphrase a member of the
>>>>>>>> English
>>>>>>>> House of Lords in the losing battle against the handgun ban  
>>>>>>>> in GB.
>>>>>>>> 'Firearms are used to defend the weak against the strong.  To
>>>>>>>> restrict
>>>>>>>> their use by citizens is to deny them the right to self defense.
>>>>>>>> Governments may have the power to do that, but should not  
>>>>>>>> have the
>>>>>>>> right.'  Apparently the British Government no longer believes
>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>> Citizens right of self defense.  Do you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> William Robb wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>> From: "P. J. Alling" Subject: Re: PESO - American Fence
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>> Hand guns don't cause crime, if that were true once Great
>>>>>>>>>> Britain
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>> banned
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>> all hand guns, (and made shotgun ownership much more  
>>>>>>>>>> difficult),
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>> violent
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>> crime would have been eliminated, in fact it increased,  
>>>>>>>>>> (violent
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>> crime
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>> rates in England are now higher than in the US).  I doubt that
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>> smuggling
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>> firearms is the cause of violent crime in Canada, it's a
>>>>>>>>>> symptom of
>>>>>>>>>> something else.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>> Straw man argument, Peter.
>>>>>>>>> Gun crimes are more likely to end up with the victim being more
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> seriously
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> hurt or dead than other types of weapons crimes, and can be
>>>>>>>>> used at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> range
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> where the victim has less chance of self defence.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> William Robb
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
>>>>>>>>                    -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
>>>>>>                       -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> -- 
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> DagT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> -- 
>> --
>>
>> The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
>>                      -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>     
>
> DagT
>
>
>
>
>   


-- 
--

The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
                        -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to