If you check out Richard's code you'll see that he appears to have used a program other than Composer to create the site. Further, he's used some specific coding that allows the page to come up in a readable form on many browsers and screen sizes. However, being readable is not always the same thing as looking good, but given the choice, I'll take readable and usable any day over something that jumbles the visuals on one system or another.
Again I'm far - very far - from an expert here, so take my comments with a bit of skepticism. OTOH, nothing, imho, beats some hands-on experience writing code. I suppose it's like the difference between manual and automatic cameras - and you know on which side of that argument I stand <g> Paul Stenquist wrote: > > I guess I'm going to try to learn as much as I can. Richard's site si quite > stunning on my browser and screen. However I'm at 1280 x 1024, and my simple > Click and Build looks good on my monitor as well. Wouldn't it be nice if there > was a consistent standard? I suppose it's coming, but it may take a while. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
