On Sep 26, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:


The photographer didn't crop it. The magazine did, and the photographer was
displeased.


That's a semantic juggle.  Unless the view is an immersive 360 degrees
in all planes, the photographer ALWAYS selects the field of view as a
portion of the entire reality.  He/she is no more innocent than the
editors who continued the act of cropping that the photographer began.

The photographer accurately portrayed the event that was taking place in the room. The magazine cropped it in such a way that its message was altered. That's not a semantic juggle. It's fact.

regards, Anthony

   "Of what use is lens and light
   to those who lack in mind and sight"
                                              (Anon)



2009/9/27 paul stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net>:

On Sep 26, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:

The "uncropped" frame was still a selective view, one that the
photographer cropped from the scene as it occurred.  We can't be
certain that the context of the uncropped picture was faithful to the
actual event, so why should we be worried by the editorial crop?

The photographer didn't crop it. The magazine did, and the photographer was
displeased.

It was a boring picture of a bunch of people including Dick Cheney.
It became a boring picture of DIck Cheney, who AFAIAC is the only
notable person in the scene. Nothing remarkable was happening before
the crop, and nothing sinister was falsely implied by the cropping.

Not true. Rather than a picture of a luncheon, it was turned into a picture of Cheney carving something that appeared to be bloody. It was clearly editorializing. Not surprising, coming from Newsweek, which frequently seems
to have an agenda.

There are things in the world to worry about that are genuinely evil,
this isn't one of them.

regards, Anthony

  "Of what use is lens and light
  to those who lack in mind and sight"
                                             (Anon)



2009/9/27 Tim Bray <tb...@textuality.com>:

Is it OK to crop a picture to make an editorial point? The answer's
not obvious.  See

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/09/the-ethics-of-photocropping.html

 -T

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to